Leftist AgendaOpinion & EditorialPatriot News

Nithya Raman Flips the LA Mayoral Race with a Stunning 43,000 Vote Swing — The Origin of Those Votes Raises Serious Questions

Nithya Raman has suddenly taken the lead over Spencer Pratt in the race for Los Angeles mayor after a massive late vote swing.

As additional ballots continue to be counted days after Election Day, Raman has pulled ahead to 27.1% while Pratt sits at 26.7%. The winner of this contest will face incumbent Karen Bass in the November runoff.

On election night, Pratt held a solid lead of roughly 40,000 votes. That lead has now completely vanished, replaced by a net swing of more than 43,000 votes in Raman’s favor.

Spencer Pratt called it out directly:

He also noted the suspicious coincidence of the number 43,000 — the same approximate figure as Los Angeles’ homeless population.

This isn’t the only anomaly raising eyebrows. Internet observers have pointed out several troubling patterns in how these late votes are falling:

– Late mail-in ballots appear to be boosting only Raman, with almost no corresponding increase for fellow Democrat Karen Bass. In a heavily mail-in city, that selective surge is highly unusual.

How did a blue city only increase votes for Nithya by mail, without increasing votes for Karen Bass?

– There was the now-infamous late-night ballot drop where one candidate received exactly zero votes out of more than 24,000 ballots — despite polling strongly beforehand. The statistical probability of that happening naturally is effectively zero.

– The mayoral race somehow produced over 12,000 more votes than the high-profile California governor’s race — the exact opposite of what you would normally expect, as more people typically vote in top-of-ticket races.

On election night, Raman herself appeared to concede. She broke down in tears and apologized to her family for failing — which made sense given her poor polling and debate performance. Now, after days of counting, she’s surging while the rest of the field stays flat.

Video:

This is the same California system that has accepted ballots with smiley faces instead of signatures, produced massive late drops with bizarre patterns, and turned voting into a weeks-long process. The extended counting window through June 9 (with final results not sealed until July 6) gives plenty of time for questions to mount.

Spencer Pratt is right to keep fighting and pointing out where these votes are coming from. When the numbers shift this dramatically and this selectively days after the election, voters have every right to demand real transparency and answers.

The people of Los Angeles deserve an election they can trust. Right now, too many aspects of this count are raising serious red flags that cannot simply be dismissed.

Whatfinger News is a premier conservative news aggregator, serving as an alternative to sites like Drudge Report. It provides a comprehensive collection of links to the latest headlines, videos, and stories from various sources, keeping readers up-to-date on current events with a focus on alternative and right-leaning perspectives.

Alex D.

Alex D is a conservative journalist, who covers all issues of importance for conservatives. He brings attention and insight from what happens in the White House to the streets of American towns, because it all has an impact on our future, and the country left for our children. Exposing the truth is his ultimate goal, mixed with wit where it's appropriate, and feels that journalism shouldn't be censored. Join him & let's spread the good word!

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
D3F1ANT
D3F1ANT
1 month ago

At this point, Americans kind of deserve this. We’re like the battered wife who just keeps staying. We all knew the Democrats would cheat…and we watched them do it while wringing our hands and stomping out feet. But we still just watched them do it. Again. As we fail to fix the elections. Again. Like I said, at this point, we kind of deserve this because we refuse act to change it.

Richard
Richard
1 month ago
Reply to  D3F1ANT

Who’s we? What exactly are the majority of us supposed to do when our elected representatives refuse to do what they are voted in to do? Over and over “we” have used the system available to us to put people in that will make the necessary changes to end the corruption and prosecute those who have engaged in or enabled the fraud. And time after time we see nothing done. Most of us know what needs to happen, but how exactly does this happen when the corrupt system we have protects the guilty and persecutes the innocent? One thing that seems quite clear to me, voting is no longer worth the time and trouble. Seems like there is no longer a way to vote our way out of this, and that the only recourse we have ahead is…something else!

David T Petrie
David T Petrie
1 month ago
Reply to  Richard

You walk up to the Mayor’s Office, grab her by the scruff of the neck, drag her out of the building, throw her into the streets and say “don’t come back.” Someone needs to take one for the team.

dlh
dlh
1 month ago

The 35% for Bass is absolutely stable. That means that Pratt is declining at the exact same rate as Raman is inclining. What are the odds?

Last edited 1 month ago by dlh
Huapakechi
Huapakechi
1 month ago
Reply to  dlh

The fix is in.

Chas
Chas
1 month ago
Reply to  dlh

The odds are greater that normal statistics would allow. There is either machine failure or blatant cheating with doctored ballots.

tom reynolds
tom reynolds
1 month ago
Reply to  Chas

both

George Frie
George Frie
1 month ago
Reply to  Chas

Either way it’s Rigged.

Huapakechi
Huapakechi
1 month ago

If/when the election fraud is finally prosecuted, will anyone go to prison?

Bubba G
Bubba G
1 month ago
Reply to  Huapakechi

No!!!!!!!

tom reynolds
tom reynolds
1 month ago
Reply to  Huapakechi

not a chance if history is any indication

HerbinOrange
HerbinOrange
1 month ago
Reply to  Huapakechi

Only those who dare to document and report it.

Bubba G
Bubba G
1 month ago

Stalin was right!! It doesn’t matter how we vote, it only matters who counts the votes!

dlh
dlh
1 month ago

Dear Raman,

You didn’t flip anything. You are no more popular now than you were on election eve.

Your party knows that Bass can beat you in November, so they eliminated the only person with a chance to beat her. They don’t want Pratt campaigning five more months and gaining in popularity. And if you get popular in those five months, do you really think they’ll let you win?

You’re smart enough to see what is happening, Raman. Are you in on it? And if you aren’t in on it, can you see the steal now? Is it so unbelievable that Trump won in 2020? If you do make it to the general, you might as well save time and concede to Bass.

Last edited 1 month ago by dlh
RICK
RICK
1 month ago
Reply to  dlh

I don’t think she’s in on it. If she was, she probably would not have conceded. I’m quite sure the machine will end any efforts to boost her once Pratt has been eliminated. Bass? She is in on it.

California won’t release its voter rolls to the feds without a fight, and we know why. The rolls have been deliberately populated with a sufficient number of fake identities that can be summoned to cast ballots that will change the true results of any election. I want to see a forensic analysis of the physical ballots that are creating this statistical improbability. Recounting fake ballots will only confirm the result; it won’t change anything. Fake ballots must be rooted out and removed from the count.

The chain of custody of the ballots will be vitally important. The dems that control the count have a history of illegally destroying ballots they are required to maintain so that they can’t be examined. Don’t let them.

As I recall, my signature was on the envelope that I returned my ballot in. I wonder if those envelopes are retained, married to the ballot they contained. We have SEIU workers performing the signature verification. Therefore, there is NO signature verification.

Even if Pratt did not win, and it would be a tough fight, I have been looking forward to 5 more months of his style of campaigning.

David T Petrie
David T Petrie
1 month ago
Reply to  dlh

Well said. Spot on!

ISUKUSA
ISUKUSA
1 month ago

And the SCOTUS will do nothing and neither will John Thune.

tom reynolds
tom reynolds
1 month ago

So Bass will run against the 2nd biggest,incompetent scumbag in the city. It’s almost like the fix is built-in. But we know our elections are the most secure in world history. Just have to stop believing my eyes and ears. Ranked choice voting is as tarded and corrupt as mail-in voting.

18
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Send this to a friend