Thomas Sowell Has A Perfect Way To Describe Liberalism

“If you’re not a liberal by the age of twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a conservative by the age of thirty you have no brain.”

In a 4-minute video posted on the Internet, an American economist, author and currently Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University explains what is the difference between Liberal and Conservative.

During the interview, Sowell has said that in his youth he had a lot of Marxist views, but everything changed one summer he took a job at the Labor Department. Suddenly, Sowell realized the government wouldn’t be even remotely capable of creating the society he had envisioned, but he also acknowledged the fact that liberals didn’t seem to operate in any kind of reality whatsoever.

He said: “Liberals are for helping people who are disadvantaged, while I think conservatives want to stop people from being disadvantaged. In other words, liberals want to help the poor while they’re poor, but really the biggest benefit is to stop them from being poor, and that’s something they have little interest in.”

Dr.Sowell is one of our greatest thinkers. This is so true! Thomas nailed it… The democrat’s entire goal is a society that is dependent on them so they can control them.

A perfect way to describe liberalism. They want to keep people down so they have a reason to exist. Would be great if the supporters of the Democrat party would pay attention to people like Thomas has to say.

The Democrat party needs a substantial number of Americans, who are government dependent, ignorant and has lacking moral values. They intentionally retard, cripple at an early age healthy human beings, destroying their lives for the sole purpose of securing their votes at the ballot box.

Share this article so can everybody learn what the true meaning of Liberalism is! What do you think, is Dr.Thomas Sowell right?

Scroll down to leave a comment below!

Natalie D.

Natalie D. is an American conservative writer! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to "stir up the pot," and does not "pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do," drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington.She is a "constitutional conservative".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.