After Trump’s Harvard Showdown, MIT Quietly Fell in Line — Here’s What They Did
While the world watched Harvard dig in its heels against President Trump’s demands, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) took a different path. In a move that has flown under the radar but speaks volumes, MIT quietly dismantled its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) office and terminated related programs, aligning itself with Trump’s vision for higher education. The New York Post broke the story today, revealing that MIT’s decision came just weeks after Trump’s explosive clash with Harvard, where the Ivy League institution refused to comply with federal mandates on hiring, admissions, and curriculum control. MIT, it seems, chose a quieter route to survival.
The specifics are telling. MIT’s DEI office, once a bustling hub of progressive initiatives, is now a ghost of its former self. The university has ended all DEI-related programs, including mandatory training sessions and affinity groups that had become staples of campus life. According to the Post, MIT’s president, Sally Kornbluth, sent a memo to faculty and staff last Friday, stating that the institution would no longer prioritize DEI in its mission. “We must adapt to the changing landscape,” Kornbluth wrote, a clear nod to Trump’s executive orders that demand an end to what he calls “discriminatory practices.”
This isn’t just about compliance; it’s about self-preservation. Harvard’s defiance led to a freeze on $2.2 billion in federal grants and $60 million in contracts, a financial blow that MIT likely wanted to avoid. The Post reports that MIT’s decision was influenced by behind-the-scenes pressure from the Trump administration, which has been systematically targeting universities it deems out of step with American values. MIT’s move is seen as a strategic retreat, ensuring its access to federal funding while sidestepping the public spectacle that Harvard embraced.
The fallout on X has been swift. Conservatives like Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA have praised MIT for “doing the right thing,” while progressives decry it as a capitulation to Trump’s agenda. But for MIT, the calculus was clear: survival over ideology. As one user put it, “Harvard wanted to be the martyr; MIT just wanted to keep the lights on.” This quiet realignment is a harbinger of things to come, as more universities grapple with Trump’s demands. For now, MIT has shown that sometimes, silence is golden.
I’m shrewd, passionate, learned and energetic, God-fearing and patriotic. I’ve done a fine job reintroducing good old American conservatism to a new generation of Americans. I’ve earned the love and friendship of many, the hatred of some, but the respect of all.
