Obama did as much damage to AMERICA as he could, Hillary was to finish it. She failed, but Muslims are here and keep trying to come. Liberal Democrats want us to believe they are good people, but they only mean is to kill all white.
Via Gateway Pundit: “Mohammed Abed, a California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA) tenure-track professor of ethics, social and political philosophy, and classical Islamic philosophy believes that genocide of white racists is “morally required”.
Mohammed Abed claims that sometimes you just have to commit genocide to save the world from the evil people…like white racists.
Interestingly and to no one’s shock, when Mohammad Abed was confronted about the Europeans facing extinction or at least an annihilation of their way of life after millions of Muslim migrants have flooded their countries, Abed argues that Muslims intend to adopt the customs of their host country rather than alter them. 1400 years of Islamic destruction is evidence to the contrary, but when have facts ever mattered to Islamic supremacists?
David Cole of Taki Mag published a phenomenal piece, picking apart this vile Muslim’s paper and exposing him for the radical that he is:
Abed reasons, it’s sometimes “morally required” to commit genocide, and he hasn’t been shy about advancing that argument in a series of lectures and essays that have somehow managed to stay under the radar of the media (especially the right-leaning media) over the past few years.
Abed lays out his central thesis in the paper’s abstract: “Genocide is not in any sense distinctively heinous. Nor is it necessarily immoral.”
Morally justified genocide? Abed realizes this might be a tough sell:
Many will no doubt be shocked by these claims. Surely a view that has such unsavory implications should be rejected. In fact, it ought to be condemned in no uncertain terms. Reactions of this sort are overblown.
Of course, any such objections by fellow academics were almost certainly silenced once Abed named the skin color of the targets of his “moral genocide”:
One can certainly concoct a hypothetical scenario in which the deliberate annihilation of a group’s way of life is a “moral and political imperative.” And there may be a case for classifying as genocide campaigns of social destruction that are widely considered to be not only excusable but morally required. The institution of slavery in the American South was, arguably, a comprehensive way of life and worldview to which many whites were profoundly attached. It would not be wildly implausible to say that their investment in the culture and norms of the slave-owning community rivaled in its social meaning and significance an individual’s affiliation with a national or religious group. But because the kidnapping, enslavement, and lifelong exploitation of innocent human beings was a constitutive and thus ineliminable feature of the life led by many Southern whites, annihilating their way of life was a moral imperative. The right course of action was to strip them of an identity that gave meaning to their lives.”
And this guy is a professor of ethics at CalState? I wonder who paid for his education? What do you call ethical about that statement? He needs to be suspended and sent packing back to his Muslim country of origin. Colleges are becoming nothing more than liberal platforms that allow extremists (on the tenure track) to teach others their philosophy. Schools, what are you thinking!!!
Living off the American Taxpayers, Islam needs to stay out of our universities! And as far as genocide being necessary to rid the world of Evil people, let start with him and his beliefs first!!
Here we have a “professor” telling children who look up to him as some kind of authority figure that there should be any type of ethnic cleansing. If a white professor ever said that about any race there would be hell to pay. Another sad example of Obama’s legacy, he tried to destroy America and almost succeeded!
What do you think? Scroll down to leave a comment below!