The Moment Susan Rice Was Supposed To Testify She Did Something That Only Proves Her Guilt

Does anyone besides me wonder how the Democrats can just say do whatever they want and get away with it, while Republicans are constantly made to justify in person their every move?

The possibility of a politically motivated unmasking by an Obama administration official has always been a possibility floated in the media, although representatives of the former administration have continued to deny that.

The House intelligence committee was supposed to interview Susan Rice this week as part of its investigation into Russia meddling in the US election last year. But, now, according to sources, the House intelligence committee has delayed classified testimony of former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice.

Apparently, Rice was supposed to speak to the panel Tuesday, but the committee has delayed her testimony for a later date. Rice, who has vehemently denied doing anything wrong, declined to comment through a spokesperson but is still expected to come before the panel at some point.

Probably she never had any intentions on showing up. Probably plead the fifth and still not tell them anything.

Last week the GOP leader of the House Russia probe, Mike Conaway, said that the investigation is going “frustratingly slow.”
“We’re all in this instant gratification world that we’ve created for ourselves and the fact that it takes response times, you get lawyers involved, back and forth organizing — that’s frustrating,” Conaway said.

I guess they are stalling to hide other evidence that may come up in the hearing, just what they always do.

Attorney and news anchor Gregg Jarrett appeared on Lou Dobbs Tonight, where he talked about Rice’s recent deferral. He pointed that Rice’s lawyers had told her to “clam up…because she’s in legal jeopardy.”

Gregg Jarrett said: “It’s a crime to lie in your request to unmask, there’s only one reason- you would decide that it was a national security [threat]. If the document on its face says there are no national security concerns, then you’ve lied.”

“It’s also a crime to use your public office for a corrupt purpose, that would be to lie.”

“It’s a crime to unmask and leak a name to the media, likely Michael Flynn.”

The bigger they are, the harder they fall! I was always amazed at the arrogance and self-righteousness of Obama’s Administration. They lie to the American people without a quiver and they pose as such do gooders yet now that these crimes are coming out, they run and hide. It’s disgusting.

But the real question should be, why isn’t she in jail already, like years ago when she went on every network tooting the Benghazi video.

What do you think? Share this article if you think Rice should be in jail!

Natalie D.

Natalie D. is an American conservative writer! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to "stir up the pot," and does not "pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do," drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington.She is a "constitutional conservative".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.