OUTRAGE: State Senator BLASTS Volleyball Captain for Forfeiting Against Men – “Step Up” Lecture Goes Wrong! (Video)
You know that infuriating moment when a female politician lectures a brave young athlete about “competitiveness” while completely ignoring the reality of biological males dominating women’s sports? That’s exactly what happened in Arizona during a Senate Education Committee hearing on HCR 2003, the Protect Girls in Sports in Arizona Act.
Former NCAA volleyball captain Kaylie Ray, who led her Utah State team to forfeit against San Jose State in 2024 in protest of a trans athlete on the opposing team, gave powerful public testimony in support of the bill. The legislation would designate sports based on biological sex — men’s, women’s, and coed — and protect private spaces like locker rooms and restrooms for women. Ray spoke from experience: “Our basic right to a fair and safe competition was violated because the people who were meant to protect us decided that validating this individual’s identity was more important. Bodies play sports, not identities.” She urged lawmakers to ensure women have equal opportunities, safety, and fairness in sports and private spaces.
But Arizona State Senator Catherine Miranda (D) found Ray’s testimony to be a sign of weakness. Miranda mocked Ray’s “sports mentality,” suggesting she’s just not competitive enough to play against men:
“I’ve played against girls that look like you. You look very much in shape and strong. But it’s a sports mentality when you’re growing up and how much competition that you’ll take on. So, it’s not just a silver bullet for one community of sports players; it’s the individual person on how competitive you want to be. So, you grew up one way. I grew up a different way. I would have taken on a man in a heartbeat.”
Miranda went on to brag about being a “tomboy” who played in boys’ little league baseball as a child and claimed she would have welcomed men in women’s sports. She even admitted the real goal: “That’s why this bill is bad because you’re just putting a whole community of women’s sports in one category when women like me, we have a different opinion.”
Ray fired back with calm precision: “As elite-level athletes, I would say we’re very competitive, which is why this bill designates three categories: male, female, and coed. If you want to compete against your man, absolutely, let’s do that in the coed section. If that’s the level of competition you want to have for yourself, amazing, go try it in the coed section.”
The exchange is captured in the hearing footage, showing Ray standing confidently at the podium in a navy top and white skirt, facing a panel of lawmakers while Miranda speaks from her seat.
Video:
Miranda’s criticisms had nothing to do with transgender athletes — she openly admitted Democrats just want men in women’s sports, and female athletes who oppose it simply lack competitive spirit. This is the real agenda: erase women’s categories under the guise of “inclusion.” The bill protects Title IX and gives women fair, safe competition — exactly what Miranda dismisses as weakness.
The left seethes when women stand up for themselves, but Ray’s testimony and sharp comeback expose the hypocrisy. Miranda wants to force biological males into women’s sports while calling opposition “uncompetitive.” Ray’s response was perfect: if you want to compete against men, go coed — leave women’s sports for women.
This hearing shows the fight isn’t over. Patriots are cheering Ray’s courage and demanding the Protect Girls in Sports Act passes. The left can lecture all they want — biology isn’t negotiable, and women deserve fairness.
**Opinion Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article, including criticisms of Sen. Miranda and praise for Kaylie Ray’s testimony, reflect a critical perspective and may not align with all readers. Facts are based on reported events, hearing transcripts, and videos; readers should form their own conclusions.**

Bruce Hoenshell is a military historian, he is one of the most prolific conservative writers today, often churning out multiple columns per week. His writings tend to focus on international themes, modern warfare. Style Sampling: “ It is not that we need social networking and Internet searches more than food and fuel, but rather that we have the impression that cool zillionaires in flip-flops are good while uncool ones in wingtips are quite bad.”
