Just when you think the Clintons’ dishonesty will stop, they pull something that makes you furious all over again. There is no getting around the fact that the Clintons will stop at nothing to acquire more power, and the latest Wikileaks email reveals something very ominous on the part of Clinton crony Donna Brazile.
One of the latest released email exchanges reveal Brazile had expressed concern over the questions during the latest town hall. “From time to time, I get the questions in advance,” Brazile wrote to Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri in regards to a question on the death penalty that “worried” her. So, the primaries were rigged, the debates were rigged, and what do you want to bet the election will be rigged too? But I digress…
“Yes, it is one she gets asked about,” Palmieri responded. “Not everyone likes her answer but can share it.” Palmieri then proceeded to forward the email to a staffer and asked them to send Brazile the proposed answer. Brazile was a vice chair of the DNC and working for CNN at that time.
At the town hall event the very next day, something interesting happened. Roland Martin asked a question with eerily similar wording. Coincidence? Brazile would have you believe that indeed.
She is strongly denying the emails in question indicate she tipped off the campaign about the question even though it was sure enough presented. According to Brazile, she “never had access” to questions and would have never shared them. Like anyone else associated with the Clintons, she has been caught in a lie thanks to Wikileaks.
By Brazile’s account, the Wikileaks documents are not authentic. Instead, she accused Assange of colluding with Russia in an attempt to influence the U.S. election.
Of course, this is a standard strategy for the Clinton team when it comes to Wikileaks, which many commentators have called “the gift that keeps on giving” for the Trump campaign. The Clinton teams insists that Julian Assange is not a “freedom fighter” but simply an arm of the Kremlin. Of course, Democrats sure didn’t seem to mind Julian Assange when he was exposing George W. Bush.
Our intelligence community has made it clear that the Russian government is responsible for the cyberattacks aimed at interfering with our election and that Wikileaks is part of that effort,” Donna Brazile said in an earlier statement. However, intelligence experts have their doubts.
On the contrary, many believe the group is acting mainly as the beneficiary of stolen documents much like any other journalistic organization. Moreover, the argument that WikiLeaks is in cahoots with Russia simply doesn’t make any sense considering Donald Trump would be tougher on the country than Clinton. If Russia were going to influence the election, why not influence it for Clinton to win?
The fact remains that Wikileaks has a “perfect, decade long record for the accuracy of its vetting process.” Although the site is claiming that themselves, one cannot deny the fact that there has not been one instance where any of the leaks were adequately disproved. Not one.
America is truly at a crossroads, and we could potentially be on the precipice of electing a president no one really wants. Moreover, if Clinton is elected, she will be the first president to be elected who has already done enough to be impeached even before her first day in office!